Date: 2007-03-05 02:11 am (UTC)
I highly recommend #6. It's far and away the strongest in the series, writing-wise, and the fact that Rowling is in desperate need of a merciless editor is far less apparent than in #5.

See my comment to [livejournal.com profile] iconoclam for my analysis of Rowling's strengths and weaknesses as a writer, but what it comes down to is that, shallow and media-fueled as the craze may be (and I don't dispute that), it's single-handedly responsible for getting millions of kids excited about reading. I like to think of it as kind of a literature gateway drug: kids who devour the Harry Potter books will, hopefully, be more likely to fall in love with better books down the road. There's no doubt in my mind that a whole lot of kids are going to become lifetime readers because of these books, and I wouldn't be able to condemn that even if I thought the books were utter tripe. As it happens, I think they're wonderful, though flawed, and I'm glad that I live in a world where a series of children's books can generate this much loyalty and angst and passion.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

grammargirl: (Default)
grammargirl

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213 1415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 06:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios